Liestoppers has just posted concerning it.
The Plaintiff's attorneys wasted little time in filing a response to Nifong's January 15 terse motion for dismissal with this filing of January 29.That’s followed by extracts from the response filing which includes reference to the U. S. Supreme Court’s recent unanimous ruling in Van de Kamp v. Goldstein.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys say Van de Kemp “reconfirms that Nifong is not entitled to absolute immunity for his investigative misconduct and public statements.”
LS links to an LS Meeting where you'll find a copy of the filing and discussion. Be sure to visit.
The title of LS’s post is a perfect summing up of the disbarred Nifong’s situation: “Nifong’s Options Running Out”
Hat tip: cks