At Politico. com reporters John Harris and Jonathan Martin explain why an Obama-Clinton ticket “is nuts.” They make a strong case for the “is nuts” position.
There’s also another article at Politico.com by reporters Harris and Martin explaining why an Obama-Clinton ticket “isn’t nuts.” They make a strong case for the “isn’t nuts” position.
Give the stories a read and then answer the following question for Mr. Zogby:
Which of the following best describes you: a) “is nuts”; B) “isn’t nuts”; C) “undecided?”
How did you answer: “is nuts” or “isn't nuts?” Or are you still "undecided?"
I posted Clinton as Obama's VP choice? yesterday before reading Harris and Martin's articles.
I was in with the “ is nuts” then, and remain so after reading today’s articles.
Now what about you?
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Obama-Clinton ticket "is nuts”/"isn’t nuts.” You decide
Posted by JWM at 8:55 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Barack will never put Hillary on that ticket! Hillary burned the bridge for that spot a long time ago. She stepped in it with the race-baiting tactics & African Americans will not forget it. The relationship is broken--forever! And I'm putting that mildly!
John -
After North Carolina and Indiana, paint me undecided.
Jack in Silver Spring
There will be no Obama-Clinton ticket. Michelle is too cheap to hire a food taster.
Obama will never put Hillary on the ticket for one simple reason: he is aiming for the White House, not for Fort Marcy Park.
Post a Comment