A blogger friend posted concerning an article in today’s London Times:
A manuscript charting the birth of modern science that was lost for centuries has been rediscovered at the bottom of a cupboard.The rest of the article is here.
The 520-page document, an account of meetings and debates at the Royal Society from 1661 to 1691, was written by Robert Hooke, one of the foremost 17th-century scientists and a bitter enemy of Sir Isaac Newton. It is described as the “discovery of a generation”.
Of course, you’ll all read it. But what does it have to do with Churchill, you’re asking?
Well, for one thing, in those recurring “Greatest Briton” polls Churchill and Newton usually go neck and neck for “first past the post.” Both greats have had their wins.
Here are some recent race results as reported in the Datelines section of Finest Hour’s Autumn, 2003 edition (p.6). (pdf)
Scientist Sir Isaac Newton triumphed in a poll for the greatest Briton conducted with an international audience.Curchillians will have no trouble congratulating our Newtonian friends. Their man is a very worthy candidate.
Viewers of BBC World voted the discoverer of gravity as the most respected Briton, ahead of Churchill who was voted the greatest Briton in a similar UK-wide poll last year. Sir Isaac polled 21.4% of the online audience. Sir Winston was second with 17%.
The apple doesn’t fall far … oh never mind.
I've only one small criticism of the Newtonians. They approach these contests with a bit too much gravity.
2 comments:
A successful story arc?
Speaking too forcefully on behalf of their man?
Equating brilliance with fame?
-AC
The Churchills of the world will always be more important than the Newtons. Or the Salks, or the Jennings, or the Von Brauns, or the Curies or the Pasteurs. Because without the Churchills the others would not have the security or freedom or confidence to do their work, as brilliant as it was. Case in point, how long did it take for the discoveries of Galileo to be accepted as truth? And why did it take so long, because he had no Churchill or Washington to secure for him the right to discover and think unfettered.
Post a Comment