Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Addison Series #2 – “CrimeStoppers will pay cash”

Readers Note: For background on this post see “The Cpl. Addison Series” and “Addison Series #1 - "This horrific crime”

Veteran Durham police officer Cpl. David Addison has for some years served as the Durham Police Department’s (DPD’s) full-time Coordinator with Durham CrimeStoppers (CS), which DPD’s website says is a separate organization independent of DPD.

According to DPD’s website:

”Local law enforcement agencies conduct CrimeStoppers investigations, but a board of directors made up of citizens from a broad cross-section of the community is responsible for establishing CrimeStoppers' policy, raising funds, and determining the amount and method of reward payments.”
That CS description is similar to the one Addison’s supervisor, Maj. Lee Russ, described to me during an interview last June.

Russ also said during a recent interview (email exchange) that Addison occasionally fills in as DPD spokesperson for DPD’s regular spokesperson, Ms. Kammie Michael.

Michael is a DPD civilian employee. She therefore does not have the police responsibilities and duties which Addison does as a sworn law enforcement officer. Nor is she in a police line of command.

From March 24, the day the public first learned of “the Duke lacrosse case” until at least March 27, Addison served DPD spokesperson for the case.

As DPD spokesperson, Addison repeatedly told the public a woman had been brutally beaten and raped at a party hosted by members of the Duke Men’s lacrosse team.

But in fact the evidence DPD had at the time indicated very strongly that the crimes Addison was telling the public in absolute terms had occurred almost certainly hadn’t, something Addison surely knew at the time.

Addison’s false statements regarding felony crimes at the party were essentially the same as those Durham DA Mike Nifong began making publicly on March 27, and would continue to make for nine months, until the NC State Bar’s Ethics Committee brought charges against him for numerous ethics violations, including publicly making such statements.

On March 24, the day Addison is first mentioned in media reports as DPD’s Duke lacrosse spokesperson, Durham police officers working the case were ordered to report directly to Nifong.

That could explain why Addison’s DPD supervisors didn’t act to correct the false information he was giving the public. They may have rationalized to themselves that correcting Addison was Nifong’s responsibility.

Press reports indicated that on either March 27 or 28 Kammie Michael began speaking for DPD on the lacrosse case.

But Addison wasn’t finished giving the public false information about “the crimes” of the Duke lacrosse players.

On March 28 Addison, acting as Durham CS Coordinator, released via email to media, DPD substations and others the first version of the Duke lacrosse CrimeStoppers “Wanted” poster. (The CS poster was amended by Addison at least twice on April 10 at the direction of his immediate DPD Supervisor, Maj. Lee Russ. I’ll say more about that in the next series post.)

The March 28 CS “Wanted” poster said in part:
The Duke Lacrosse Team was hosting a party at the residence. The victim was sodomized, raped, assaulted and robbed. This horrific crime sent shock waves throughout our community.
The “Wanted” poster ended:
Information can also be provided anonymously through Durham CrimeStoppers at 683-1200 or by email to david.addison@durhamnc.gov (Please use an anonymous email account). Durham CrimeStoppers will pay cash for any information which leads to an arrest in this case. (The full text of the “Wanted” poster is the third document in this post.)
[Before going further, I want to remind readers the CS “Wanted” poster and the “Vigilante” poster are two very different documents. For more information about their differences, see here.]

No one disputes that when Addison served as DPD spokesperson from March 24 to 27 for the Duke lacrosse case, he did so as a sworn, veteran DPD officer. Both DPD and the City of Durham bear responsibility for what he said and did then.

However, there is considerable contention regarding the circumstances in which Addison produced and distributed the CS “Wanted” poster. There’s also contention regarding which of three agencies (CS, DPD and Durham City) bear what, if any, responsibility for Addison’s “Wanted” poster actions.

There are also questions that need to be answered concerning why Addison produced the “Wanted” poster in the first place.

Did Addison produce the poster at the behest of Nifong or a DPD officer who was reporting to Nifong? Or did Addison simply produce the poster entirely on his own because he thought it was what a DPD officer and CS Coordinator should do on March 28?

A few other questions from among many that need to be answered: Did Addison at any time discuss the “Wanted” poster with anyone connected with the Duke lacrosse investigation, including Nifong and officers reporting to him? Did he discuss it at any time with any DPD officers, including his DPD supervisors, before April 10 when Russ directed him to change it?

Let’s sort through the contentions and questions. We can’t resolve everything, put we can get some things “out there.”

First, what do Addison and CS have to say about the dissemination to the media and community of a CS “Wanted” poster that made what Addison knew were false charges directed against 46 Duke students, none of whom the police by March 28 had even identified as primary suspects and brought in for questioning, and some of whom DPD knew had not only not been at the party, but had not even been in Durham the night Crystal Mangum made her false accusations?

In a word: Nothing!

Beginning last May and continuing this January, I called Addison at his CS number repeatedly and left VMs. I always ID’ed myself as a blogger and explained my purpose for calling.

Helpful DPD personnel even gave me Addison’s cell number. VMs left there were never returned, either.

During my recent email interview with Maj. Russ, I explained Addison’s failure to respond to my calls. I asked Russ if he could help get Addison to respond.

Russ told me:
“Cpl. Addison will have no further comments on this incident or the Duke Lacrosse case in general.”
Write it down: DPD’ s first spokesperson on the Duke lacrosse case and it’s CS Coordinator and “Wanted” poster producer will have “no further comments” on his statements to the public that innocent citizens had committed a “brutal rape” and “this horrific crime.”

As with Addison, I’ve tried many times to reach CS representatives since last May. My calls have never been returned.

Does Durham CS have an active board of directors? Does Durham CS have regular board meetings, open to the public or at least reported on in media?

Not that I can find out.

I asked Russ last June if he knew how I could reach anyone at CS. He told me to just keep trying what I was already doing.

In that same interview last June Russ said Addison had a kind of blanket authority from CS’s board to issue at his discretion “solicitations of information” (a term DPD uses interchangeably with “Wanted” poster, flyer, email).

It was, Russ said, with that CS authority and acting as CS Coordinator that Addison produced the “Wanted” poster. Therefore, Russ maintains, DPD does not bear responsibility for the production and distribution of the March 28 “Wanted” poster.

In correspondence I’ve reviewed, Durham’s city manager, Patrick Baker, has said essentially the same thing.

Since I’ve not been able to reach anyone at CS, I can’t report its position regarding any responsibility it bears for a poster that a Durham attorney, Alex Charns, acting on behalf of an unidicted Duke lacrosse player, says libeled the players.

Charns has requested an internal DPD investigation and report concerning the production and distribution of the March 28 poster as well as a full public apology to the players by the City of Durham for its distribution to media and the public.

In the next Addison Series post, I’ll report on the steps Charns has taken and the responses of DPD and Durham City.

I interviewed Charns on Feb. 19 and I’m awaiting a call back from Baker’s office. So I should be able to give you “the latest” on what’s happening. The post is titled: “Not my poster.”

That post will be followed by the last two in the Addison Series: “Sue who?” and “It’s called ‘squeezing.’”

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where would this case be without the internet and bloggers? It must be a real shock to DPD, CS, Mr. Baker, Cpl. Addison and all their buddies.

Thanks once again, John, for great research.

Anonymous said...

One should recall that Addison had, shortly before the March 14 incident, received some public recognition for his work in other cases. My best guess as to what happened is this:

CS is the type of organization created to give citizens something to do that helps them feel useful. So, the City of Durham creates it, the DPD "staffs" it, and citizens can help as much or as little as they want. It's run by a citizens' board that is, largely, clueless. Apparently here, Addison was given "blanket authority" to do pretty much whatever he wanted. In other words, public-minded citizens were thrown a bone, but CS was really run by DPD ... and more specifically, by whoever "staffed" it.

Meanwhile, the DPD, having Addison as the "staffer" and obviously a liason, lets him do his thing. My best guess is that supervision of Addison by the DPD was lax, at best.

Addison, meanwhile, basically having carte blanche from CS, little or no supervision from DPD, and having recently been recognized for some of his work, let it all go to his head. And basically went wild. And no one caught it in time because no one was supervising him.

And when it all went south, DPD started running for cover. They appear to be leaving Addison and CS hanging out to dry - a sacrificial victim.

My personal thought is - Addison deserves what he gets from third parties for his actions. DPD ALSO remains absolutely liable for an absolute and manifest failure to supervise him and to monitor his activities. The City of Durham and DPD set it up - Addison took the rope he was given, tried to hang others, wound up hanging himself... and DPC is slinking away from the lynching tree hoping no one will notice them.

Not facts - just my best conjecture as to the most plausible scenario, based on my own experiences with organizations such as this.

Brand

Anonymous said...

So, DPD has plausible deniability of Addison's statements because he was 'on loan' to CrimeStoppers - and Crimestoppers has "no address" so you can't nail them down.

only in Durham

Anonymous said...

Very informative. Thanks for producing this unique report.

kbp said...

Thanks John!

Surely there is some tax ID number for this group. Call the IRS and see if they can help. Tell them your having problems listing your donations, you think that CS group might be spending ALL that money you doanated on themselves, personally.

Seriously, would they have to file annual reports with some department at the state, like corporations do?

Anonymous said...

When will the lawsuits begin? Isn't it time to go on the offensive?

straightarrow said...

John, go after the printer. He knows who paid him and from which institution the check was drawn.

He won't want to cooperate, but I think all the junkyard dog lawyers just waiting for a chance at civil lawsuits may be able to change his mind. If he can't tell who his customer was and who paid him, he can be threatened with a lawsuit for defamation at the least, and other torts.

He will roll over. When he does just follow the same procedure all the way back to the original authorizing agent. These are not people of principle. They have made that obvious. They are not stonewalling because of loyalty to each other. They are doing it in hope of avoiding any responsibility themselves. If they are made to understand, at each level, the failure to cooperate will result in themselves bearing the brunt of the quest for recompense, they will roll over on their own so fast in competition with each other that it might be mistaken for a whirling dervish convention.

I grew up around tough guys, crooks, mobsters and cops, sometimes they were all the same people. I never knew one with enough character and courage to take a fall for anyone out of loyalty. Trust me, the above will work. Of course, you will need a lawyer willing to push it with a client that has standing. That shouldn't be too hard to find, under the circumstances. I can think of at least 48 plaintffs, counting the cabbie and the coach. There are probably a thousand lawyers that would like to have any one of them as a client.

DPD, CS, Duke, and Nifong have stepped on their di....uh, appendages. It's gonna hurt.

Anonymous said...

NBC-17 showed uniformed DPD officers going house to house in the Buchanan neighborhood delivering Addison's "flier". One of the defense attorneys, I believe it was Bob Ekstrand, was shown reading Addison's outlandish allegations directly from the flier.

I don't see how DPD can now contend it was all CrimeStoppers fault, when it was Durham police shown on video distributing Addison's document.

kbp said...

Anon 8:21 mentioned "...recognition for his work in other cases", so I wonder if Addison's actions in this case resembled a pattern he followed in past cases. The limit of the number of times he was the spokesman for DPD could make this hard or impossible to determine.

Had he previously been an advocate for rape victims or agendas pushed by black leaders?

If so, which and when?

If not, what pushed him to do such in this case?

Anonymous said...

Nice Blog. I will keep reading. Please take the time and visit my blog about: Internet Marketing and Making Money Online

MajorEnterprise

Anonymous said...

I wonder if the reward is still offered, I think I will send an anonymous email to Crimestoppers that I beleive a Crystal Gail Magnum is responsible for the crime.

Anonymous said...

150 Websites embedded with worldwide influence;Ready To Go These websites are ready to market. Over 150 different web businesses and hosted for free! Imagine having at your beckoning, 150 different web businesses with their web pages already built for you and embedded with a sense in adsense delivering immediate and long term income and residual wages.

Anonymous said...

There is alot of debate whether you can Make Easy Money Online and with so many scams out there it is bound to be a little bit dishearting!

So are there any legit ways to Make Easy Money Online?

Well, Yes you will be glad to know there are legit ways to Make Easy Money Online the only thing is all of them require hard work!

I know there are websites out there that claim you can become a millionaire overnight but if you think about it this is just not plausible!

That said with a bit of work on your part you will be suprised how easy it is to Make Easy Money Online and you should start off by searchnig for more info on Google and maybe join a few groups with like minded people!

If you really want to know how to Make Easy Money Online I would suggest investing in this manual, but only if you are serious as they will give you the keys to the door but you must open it so to speak!

One guide I would recommend that was created by an internet marketing genius, Carael Knight that made it big is called "How To Get Rich Selling Information Through Classified Ads"!

For more info on MajorEnteprise and how you can start to Make Easy Money Online, click the link below:

Make Easy Money Online

Anonymous said...

Work at home opportunites For people who are smart enough to go after there own dreams

Work from home opportunites

Women who have children will love it...