Legal tabloid Above the Law headlines:In the tabs’ story we read:
. . .The system for notifying students of whether they had been accepted to journals was flawed.The story includes an email from Duke Law’s Director of Publications.
Some people were told they were accepted by a journal when, in fact, they were not.
Others were given placement on journals they didn't apply for. …
And yes, it's all the fault of “a new computer program.”
Dear AllBe sure to read the comment thread. Here's the first comment:
For the first time, this office used a new computer program intended to improve the efficiency of the process to assist in making the selections for journal membership. Selection lists generated by the program were distributed to the journals on Thursday.
After this distribution, we discovered, and for reasons the publications office does not yet fully understand, the program generated significant errors.
As a result some students who should have received offers for journal membership did not receive those offers, or did not receive offers to join their preferred journal. Some of the offers extended for journal membership were extended in error and will have to be reconsidered.
We are working to redo the selection process as quickly as possible, and will be working through this weekend. We expect to have this process completed by the end of the day on Monday and have the corrected selection lists sent to the journals then.
I very much regret these mistakes and the obvious upset and uncertainty these errors are causing you. Please accept my sincere apology.
It was fun being on DLJ for a day.
Hat tip: A Duke Law friend