Friday, June 02, 2006

Durham columnist: So what if she lied

Tom Bevan at Realclearpolitics.com:

It's hard to believe anyone could write the following line, but John McCann does it anyway in today's Durham Herald-Sun:
"The lacrosse boys brought it on themselves, though -- even if the accuser's lying."
This is despicable. Would McCann, who is black, even think of writing the same thing if the case involved a white accuser and 44 black members of the football team? Of course not.
Perfect word choice, Tom.

What McCann says is despicable. It's every bit as despicable as Jesse Jackson's offering a college scholarship to the accuser regardless of whether she was telling the truth.

Despicable too was the failure of the liberal/leftist press to condemn Jackson's offer for what it was: an assault on truth and fairness.

Tom Bevan continues:
McCann brushes off the injustice suffered by the Duke lacrosse players with the trite phrase, "that's what can happen when you don't keep your nose clean."

This is a cowardly cop-out, not to mention McCann is invoking a standard that is unrealistic as well as unjust.

Does he mean anyone who attends a party where there is beer and strippers can be falsely accused of anything under the logic that attending the party in the first place isn't "keeping your nose clean?"

Setting aside the fact that three young men stand accused of a crime that could cost them the better part of their lives behind bars, the forty-four Duke players who have not been charged with committing any crime didn't deserve to have their reputations trashed and their season cancelled, or to be stigmatized and abandoned by the Duke faculty and university administration.

To suggest the players brought all this on themselves by the mere act of attending a party is more than grotesquely unfair, it's also a clever way to absolve those in the media and the community whose behavior toward the Duke players has been so shameful throughout this entire episode.

I understand it's difficult for some to focus on the facts in this case because the facts, at least at the moment, aren't very favorable toward the accuser.

As a result, this case is upsetting a whole host of traditional liberal stereotypes and tactics, not the least of which is a seemingly innate liberal reflex to attack white males as symbols of privilege and racial oppression whenever possible. (Bold added)

McCann's suggestion that the Duke players deserve the way they've been treated "even if the accuser's lying" shows just how warped that mentality can be and represents a new low point in the whole tragic saga.
Well said, Tom.

Now let's turn the floor over to Betsy Newmark.
Can anyone believe that this guy would write the same thing if it were 40 black players accused of raping a white woman and if all the known evidence showed that they were innocent.

Would Mr. McCann be so sure that it doesn't matter that these guys have had their reputations ruined and that they had lost the chance to play the sport they'd come to Duke to play?

Would he just say so self-righteously that the black players deserved whatever they got even if a white stripper was lying about what happened? [...]

I know that parents across the country have used the Duke lacrosse story as a salutary lesson to tell their college-age children to be more careful about their behavior and to avoid such situations. But, no one deserves to have his life turned upside down because some woman made up a story about what happened to her at the party. [...]
McCann, like all of his kind, has no idea he is what he is. Let's hope in time he'll learn and change.

It might help McCann to take a long look at some fine leaders like Durham Mayor Bill Bell and NC Central University Chancellor James Ammons. I can't see either of them buying into "even if the accuser's lying."

Meanwhile, isn't it wonderful to have access to bloggers like Betsy and Tom.

No wonder they're worried in the newsrooms.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

David Evans seem to be a man of integrity and courage to speak out against the claims against him. The stripper seems well armed with all the powers of “victim (i.e. mass public sympathy, militant feminist groups, female “victims” advocate groups, racists groups from the NBPP, Je$$ie Jack$on, NAACP, and many individuals from NCCU, etc.

Why isn’t the possibility that the stripper made a false claim been investigated?

Why is DA Nifong trying to “stonewalling” the stripper’s cell phone from the investigators which may show that she was on the phone at the time she made up the story of rape.

a. Stripper possibly made a false claim of rape by three boys in 1996.
b. Stripper made a false claim of kidnapping in 1998
c. Stripper charged with larceny, auto theft, and trying to kill a police officer in 2002
d. 1st round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team.
e. 2nd round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team
f. DNA proves stripper had sex with boyfriend/pimp and two other men around the time she was dropped off at the party, which accounts for the “rape kit” evidence of recent sexual activity.

g. The bathroom is absolutely and completely devoid of any evidence of a rape. Where is her DNA? Urine, blood, vaginal fluid, saliva, or tears?
h. Many people’s DNA were found under her nails but none from the innocent lacrosse boys. The only DNA that has a partial link to one of the boys was found on the top surface of the fake nail.
i. She lied about losing her fake finger nails in a desperate struggle in the small enclosed bathroom, but pictures show that she removed her nails before inadequately performing her routine. No scratches were found on any of the innocent lacrosse boys’ bodies. No DNA of any lacrosse boy was found under the nail.
j. The 2 innocent boys she “eeny meeny miney moed” to be her rapists weren’t even at the party the time she claimed the rape occurred. She claims that she’s 100% sure, but she told her father that she’s not sure.
k. The DA is trying to suppress the stripper’s cell phone which may contain records of her being on the phone at the time she claimed she was suppose to be being raped by boys who weren’t even there.

The Duke lacrosse girls have worn “innocent” arm bands to show their support for these boys and for hope in a system that is suppose to protect the innocent from malicious prosecution.

These awesome women aren’t only taking a stand for the victims of this rape accusation, but for all real rape victims everywhere. These women should be recognized as future leaders of victims’ rights and advocacy.

Anonymous said...

Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Mentioned No Condoms Were Used
It seems the defense keeps finding more to support their side of things, with each new piece of information they get. Now from that stack of 1,300 papers, they have discovered that the stripper accuser mentioned no condoms were used. No condoms and…
The stripper’s body was completely void of any sign of a sexual assault (except for signs of recent vaginal and anal from her boyfriend). The alleged crime scene was completely devoid of DNA.

It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, sweat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen... especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?

When investigators questioned the stripper after DNA tests on the semen found inside her vagina and rectum didn’t match any of the Duke players, the stripper admitted to having had sex with at least three men around the time of the alleged rape. The stripper named her boyfriend and two men who drove her to Duke.


When questioned, the “drivers” said they would drop her off at several places, including hotel rooms.

It appears that the stripper has sex with men for rides to her strip shows…Nasty!

Anonymous said...

Lawyers are lurking in the shadows for lucrative civil suit

A man stands in the shadows of the Duke Lacrosse 'rape' case…watching and waiting. While the three wealthy white students remains in criminal court, he is not likely to step forward.

Even at this early stage, the stripper’s mother is "very much interested" in "getting Willie E. Gary is a litigator renowned for winning huge settlements.

The stripper’s parents met with Gary in April. The meeting was facilitated by civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson.

Gary acts as a family adviser, and the parents are laying groundwork to make a civil bid. Public opinion can be a large bargaining chip in obtaining a lucrative settlement. Earlier, the parents spoke freely; now they’re being more media savvy.

Essence Magazine featured three articles by Kristal Brent Zook. Each is sympathetic to the accuser. (1st) "Family Defends Daughter's Painful Past", (2nd) "Nowhere to Turn," depicts the accuser as living in terror. (3rd) is basically an announcement of Willie Gary's appearance in the case; it concludes by stating that the parents "worry that their daughter may…need additional legal guidance."

Civil law deals in torts or harms inflicted by one person upon another; its purposes are compensation for actual or perceived damages.

A "guilty" verdict in criminal court can be used to establish liability in a civil one but if the verdict is "not guilty" or the charges are dropped, a civil case can proceed independently.

Kobe Bryant settled out-of-court settlement. Such settlements are not necessarily admissions of guilt. After months of media blitz, Bryant may have been embarrassed to settle, so civil suits could be lucrative even if the “accuser’s” claim is completely fabricated. The Duke students will face the same choice?

Civil suits can be lucrative, and they’re easier to win; standards of evidence and other legal protections enjoyed by a defendant are significantly lowered in civil court.

Clearly, her parents wish to explore a civil proceeding. Gary is conspicuously available.

Anonymous said...

So, wait, if "failing to keep your nose clean" gets you what you deserved then isn't this actually handy for the defence?

After all, this woman is divorced, had two children out of wedlock, is a stripper, and got really drunk.

If you're going to balance the scales of justice with "clean noses" then I'm going to guess that the LAX boys are going to come out on top on that one.

Deee-spicable.

-AC

JWM said...

I'll respond to the 3 anons in order treating each anon as an individual person rather than assuming they are the same.

To anon. "David Evans seem etc.,

On the DNA matters the media has poorly served the public by not interviewing people expert in DNA gathering, etc. and asking them what are the chances of no positive matches in circumstances described.

I plan to post a set of questions next week that I don't think the media has addressed. The DNA will be part of that.

To anon. "It seems the defense keeps ..."

A lot of the information in your comment is new to me. Can you source it for me. I want to follow up on it.

To anon. "A man stands in the shadows ..."

I read that story too.

It might not play out quite the way the story suggested.

I'd be willing to bet if the accuser and the second dancer take any legal action it will be against Duke U, Duke U Med Center, and Durham Police.

I doubt if they have any case to go after the players when most of the facts are on the table.

On the other hand, it wouldn't surprise me if some or all of the players bring actions.

It's becoming increasing clear to intelligent and fair-minded people that a number of organizations were less than they are supposed to be; and as a result the players, guilty of no crime have suffered grievously and sad to say, perhaps irreparably.

Thank you anon or anons for your comments.

John

Anonymous said...

Really amazing! Useful information. All the best.
»

Anonymous said...

Greets to the webmaster of this wonderful site! Keep up the good work. Thanks.
»