Duke Prof Wiegman loses

{Correction: This post initially said Duke's Women's Studies Director and professor Robyn Wiegman was a Group of 88 signer. The Johnsville News tells me she's not.

I've made the corrections.

I'm sorry for my error and grateful to TJN for pointing it out.

John
____________________________________

Readers Note: I've an independent minded friend who's a professor at a university with an arts & humanities faculty that tips Left. He often contends with individual members, who typically respond with rudeness and vitriol.

How does he stand it, I asked my friend?

"Well, I have my wins and they sustain me."

What's a "win" from those folks? Do they ever admit they're wrong? Write you a letter back saying, "Sorry?"

"Oh, no," my friend said. "Nothing like that. I know I've won when they're silent. No letter denouncing me in the student newspaper. No phone call to my department chair. Just silence.

I don't complain. I know I made my point and they can't refute it. So silence is all I get; and I count that a win"

By my friend's standards, I've won a few rounds with Duke's Director of Women's Studies professor Robyn Wiegman.

Wiegman, who usually is very quick to give her opinions and correct others, has twice said nothing in response to email inquiries and information I sent her, first in October and then in a copy in November.

I think Wiegman's silence means, like my friend says, I've made my points and silence is all I'll get. So I've won.

Below is the email I twice sent Wiegman. Think about my email the next time one of the 88 talk about all the threatening emails they get from "blog hooligans."

You don't see any reason why the Director of Women's Studies at Duke would find ol' JinC's email threatening, do you?

If you do, please don't report me to one of those new Hate Speech Commissars the CCI is planning to turn loose at Duke.

John
________________________________________________

Robyn Wiegman
Margaret Taylor Smith Director Women's Studies
Professor, Women's Studies and Literature

Dear Professor Wiegman:

I hold two degrees from the university and blog as www.johnincarolina.com

In your Chronicle letter of Oct. 25 you write:

“[M]y colleague Steven Baldwin …finds the faculty response to the Duke lacrosse scandal one that warrants their being ‘tarred and feathered, ridden out of town on a rail and removed from the academy.’”(bold mine)
But that’s not true, Professor Wiegman.

Baldwin didn’t say anything about "the faculty response." He spoke about responses by some individual faculty members who engaged in certain despicable conduct which he described.

Read Baldwin’s words:

I do not believe that a faculty member publicly describing any student in pejorative terms is ever justified. To do so is mean-spirited, petty and unprofessional, at the very least. The faculty who publicly savaged the character and reputations of specific men's lacrosse players last spring should be ashamed of themselves.

They should be tarred and feathered, ridden out of town on a rail and removed from the academy. Their comments were despicable. I suspect they were also slanderous, but we'll hear more about that later.

Surely you didn't miss the fact that Baldwin's remarks concerned only certain faculty whose conduct he described. Not all faculty, thankfully, engaged in such despicable conduct.

Why did you fail to acknowledge that, and instead say: "Baldwin ...finds the faculty response ...?"

You'll find enlightening the following information from The American Heritage Dictionary of Idions:

"tar and feather"

Criticize severely, punish, as in The traditionalists often want to tar and feather those who don't conform. This expression alludes to a former brutal punishment in which a person was smeared with tar and covered with feathers, which then stuck. It was first used as a punishment for theft in the English navy, recorded in the Ordinance of Richard I in 1189, and by the mid-1700s had become mob practice. The figurative usage dates from the mid-1800s.

On another matter, I'm told that Women's Studies has made no statement condemning the threats of physical violence and death threats hurled by racists on May 18 at Reade Seligmann, both outside the courthouse and within the courtroom before the judge entered.

Is that true?

I'm also told Women's Studies has no plans to honor a group of outstanding women who constitute the only large Duke group who to date publicly acknowledge it was a hoax and have spoken out on behalf of the three wrongly indicted innocent students.

Is it true Women's Studies has no plans to honor the Women's lacrosse team and its coaches?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

John in Carolina