Golf and bias at Raleigh's News & Observer

(Note: The news story discussed below is unavailable to me at The Raleigh News & Observer's archives but can be accessed at another archive here.)

Liberal bias? There’s none of that in the news columns of Raleigh’s News & Observer, a McClatchy paper. At least that’s what its executive editor for news, Melanie Sill, says.

But then you find a front page N&O story, “On links, politicians get caught in a trap” (Aug. 22), that reads more like a Democratic National Committee talking points memo than a genuine news story.

The story begins:

What is it about golf that attracts political scandal?
<….>
"Golf is one of two activities that bring out the worst in politicians," Hollywood writer Peter Mehlman said. "The other is politics."

You’re then told Ohio’s Republican Gov. Bob Taft was found guilty of violating state ethics laws for failing to report golf outings

And you’re told in great detail about golf trips Republican Rep. Tom DeLay took which were paid for by lobbyists; and which the House Ethics Committee is investigating. The N&O included a picture of DeLay, the only one accompanying the story.

The N&O even tells you about a golf trip former Republican Vice President Dan Quayle took back in 1980. It was with a group of congressmen and lobbyists. The trip proved embarrassing to Quayle when it turned out one of the congressman was accompanied by an attractive lobbyist who had posed for Playboy.

Quayle was never accused of any impropriety on the trip but The N&O was able to tell readers that as Vice President, he got “into hot water for mangling the English language” and that his wife said he would “rather play golf than have sex.”

At this point, reader, you may be saying, “Wait! Three big name Republicans, and for one of them The N&O had to go back to a trip 25 years ago on which nobody claims Quayle did anything wrong. Geez.

What about Democrats? Former President Clinton? Didn’t he play a lot of golf with Washington power-broker Vernon Jordan; and didn’t Jordan try to get Monica Lewinsky a job after she left the White House; and didn’t he meet with Lewinsky and get her a lawyer? Jordan admitted all of that to a grand jury, didn’t he? And at the end of the Lewinsky scandal didn’t Clinton have to pay fines? And wasn’t he disbarred by the Supreme Court?

Did The N&O report any of that? Isn't what I'm saying true?”

Those are all good questions, reader. Here are the answers.

No, The N&O didn't report any of that. All it said about Clinton was that he's a "golf nut" who as President played often and took uncounted re-shots.

Yes, what you're saying is true.

From a transcript of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer (March 3, 1998)

The two men also spend a great deal of time together outside the White House in golf games at courses around Washington and during summertime visits to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts. Jordan's name was associated with the Monica Lewinsky saga almost from the beginning. On January 22nd, just days after the story broke, Jordan publicly acknowledged that he had tried to help the former White House intern after she left government.

VERNON JORDAN: I did two things for Ms. Monica Lewinsky: I assisted her in trying to find employment in the private sector in New York City. Secondly, when she was served with the subpoena and, at her request, I recommended a very competent Washington lawyer, Mr. Frank Carter. I actually took her to Mr. Carter's office.

A federal judge later cited President Clinton for civil contempt for giving "intentionally false" testimony under oath regarding his relationship with Lewinsky and fined him $90,000.

The bar association in Clinton’s home state, Arkansas, investigated further; and then recommended to its state Supreme Court his disbarment?

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed its bar association’s recommendation, and so informed the United States Supreme Court.

On October 1, 2001, without dissent and for the first time in the nation’s history, the U. S. Supreme Court acted to disbar a former President.

In his autobiography, My Life, Clinton expressed the hope that his golfing buddy would "be able to forgive me for the mess I had gotten him into"(p.779).

Do you find it interesting that at The N&O Taft and DeLay's problems and a golf trip Dan Quayle took a quarter century ago are front page news while all that happened to Clinton and Jordan is ignored?

You may be asking whether The N&O mentions anything remotely scandalous involving a Democrat and golf.

Yes, it does. One person.

He's David Watkins, a minor functionary in the Clinton White House, who took an unauthorized trip to a golf match on the President's Marine helicopter and later resigned.

Can you see why I think the story reads more like a Democratic National Committee talking points memo than a genuine news story?

No liberal bias in The News & Observer's news columns.

Can you believe that?

If you'd like to take another look at The N&O's front page story, here again is a link .

An MSM paper helps the Left: Chapter 1

(THIS IS THE FIRST CHAPTER IN A SERIES THAT EXAMINES HOW ONE MSM NEWSPAPER, RALEIGH'S NEWS & OBSERVER, REPORTED ON THE SATURDAY, SEPT. 24, RALLY IN WASHINGTON, D.C.)

Last Saturday's "anti-war" rally in Washington, D.C. was a serious challenge for Raleigh's News & Observer, one of the McClatchy Organization's most profitable newspapers.

As a liberal, perhaps really a Leftist news organization, The N&O naturally wanted to report the rally in the most favorable way possible.

But N&O staffers knew there was so much about the rally - its goals, organizers, speakers and participants, - that would disgust, even anger, many of its readers..

So how could The N&O report the rally in a way that was sympathetic to the Left without alienating many N&O readers? It was a tough problem.

If you doubt that, consider just two examples of what N&O staffers faced as they prepared to report the rally "sunny side up."

There was first the problem of the rally's principal sponsor: International A.N.S.W.E.R.

N&O staffers knew if their readers went to A.N.S.W.E.R.'s web site they'd learn that besides supporting the terrorist al-Zarqawi's demand that American and other coalition forces immediately withdraw from Iraq, A.N.S.W.E.R. wants an end to what it calls America's "threats against Venezuela, Cuba, Iran & North Korea"; an American "withdrawal from Puerto Rico" (I'm not kidding); and a ban of military recruiters from not just our schools but from every one of our communities. If you doubt what I'm saying , go here to A.N.S.W.E.R.'s web site. It's all there.

A second problem for The N&O was the rally speakers and what they represent. Example: Lynne Stewart, an attorney recently convicted of aiding the jailed terrorist Omar Abdul Rahman by passing information to his terrorist supporters in Egypt. Rahman was the spiritual leader of the group that carried out the first World Trade Center bombing and was planning to blow up the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels connecting New York City and New Jersey.

Another speaker was former attorney-general Ramsey Clark who protested America's treatment of Saddam after his capture and expressed his belief Saddam was innocent of the charges brought against him.

Clark's love for the Left is nothing new. For decades he's praised Jane Fonda for her Vietnam War trip to Hanoi during which she expressed support for our then enemies who were holding and torturing American servicemen.

N&O staffers knew A.N.S.W.E.R., Stewart, and Clark's actions and goals posed a serious threat to their reporting plans. They had to act quickly if they were to have any chance of reporting the rally in Sunday's editions as a "sunny side up" event.

Staffers agreed they'd do what journalists refer to as "just leave it out." The term pretty much means what it says, and is easily understood even by people with little or no training in professional journalism.

Thus it happened that The N&O's rally reporting made no mention of its principal sponsor or of speakers such as Lynne Stewart and Ramsay Clark.

The N&O had managed a major news problem.
_______________________________________________________

Tomorrow, in Chapter 2, we'll learn some of what reporter and author Christopher Hitchens said about the rally and its organizers. He'll tell us things The N&O didn't. We'll also look at how The N&O dealt with the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rally activities

NOTE: The N&O's rally story appeared Sunday, Sept. 25, on pg. 3A. I'm sorry I can't provide a link to it but The N&O is available in most North Carolina public and university libraries. For Lexis/Nexis searches, use the identifying information already given as well as the lead: War protesters march in D.C.

Raleigh News and Observer posts

I'll be posting tonight by 10 PM eastern on The N&O's coverage of last Saturday's "anti-war" rally.

Tomorrow by noon I'll post on an example of The N&O using golf in "news story" that was really just one long exercise in liberal news bias. And The N&O did it in a front page story.

Paris latest terrorist target. Surprised?

Do you believe those MSM pundits and terrorist apologists such as George Galloway and Cindy Sheehan who say London and Rome are terrorist targets because their governments support U. S. policies in Iraq?

If you do, you're in for a shock. Paris, capital of the Western nation that's arguably done the most to undermine U.S. policies in Iraq, is the terrorists' latest target.

Agence France-Presse this morning headlines: Terror suspects eyeing up Paris metro, airport

It reports:

Terror suspects detained in France had been eyeing up the Parisian metro network, an airport and the headquarters of the domestic intelligence service as possible targets, sources close to the investigation said.
<...>
Among those being held is Safe Bourada, 35, who was released from prison in 2003 after five years for helping organise a series of bomb attacks in France in 1995 for the Algerian Armed Islamic Group (GIA).
<...>
Officials said the men were members of the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC), an armed Algerian group that grew out of the GIA and has links to the Al-Qaeda network. Bourada was described as their ringleader.

The GSPC has threatened to carry out attacks in France and it is seen as a credible danger by intelligence officials.
<...>

I'm sorry for the French people that they must live under terrorist threat.

I hope this latest news will help diminish the number of people who provide excuses for the terrorists. They're only making it easier for the terrorists to spread and inflict terrorism.

Be sure to Open Newmark's Door

Be sure to open Newmark's Door today and visit with Craig. He posts on a range of topics from MSM misreporting of Katrina events to a theory regarding why the NYT would charge extra for people to read Paul Krugman et al. Craig doesn't necessarily support the theory but it's safe to say he acknowledges it has a certain plausibility.

One post touched me deeply. I think it will you as well.

Here's Newmark's Door.

Learning about the Vatican

CNN reports an Italian magazine has published what it says are portions of a secret diary keep by a Cardinal during the recent conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI.

Two sharp bloggers, Ed Morrissey at Captain's Quarters and Betsy Newmark at Betsy's Page, post on the matter.

I'm glad to leave the serious analysis to them and just tell you a little story about understanding the Vatican.

It seems back many years ago a reporter was assigned to cover the Vatican. He wasn't a Catholic and didn't know anything about the Vatican.

A Cardinal friend agreed to help him. The Cardinal made special arrangements for the reporter to actually live in the Vatican for four weeks.

Two weeks into his stay, the reporter was granted a private audience with the Pope.

Pope and reporter got on so well the Pope invited him to stay for dinner; just the two of them.

Near the end of the dinner, the reporter asked the Pope if he thought living in the Vatican for four weeks was enough time to gain at least a basic understanding of how it really worked.

The Pope paused for a moment and then said, "Four weeks is good but four months would be better, and four years not enough."

Another threat to MSM news organizations

(WELCOME VISITORS FROM MUDVILLE GAZETTE, MICHELLE MALKIN, AND OTHER BLOGS I'M SURE I'VE MISSED.

I WROTE THIS POST SATURDAY NIGHT AFTER THE RALLY. MY PREDICTION ABOUT HOW RALEIGH'S NEWS & OBSERVER WOULD REPORT THE RALLY SUNDAY WAS ACCURATE. HOW DID YOUR LOCAL NEWSPAPER DO? THANKS FOR VISITING. John)

I'm beginning to recognize the power of photo blogging, and the challenge it poses to MSM news organizations.

Maybe you've known for a while about that challenge. But I haven't, so please listen to my story.

Tonight, Saturday, Sept. 24, I went to Michelle Malkin's blog and saw photos of today's anti-war rally in Washington, where assorted Democrats and Leftists demanded America do what the terrorist al-Zaquari's been demanding: Pull our troops out of Iraq.

The rally photos Michelle posted included one of an activist holding a sign about the Vice-president: "Convict and castrate Cheney." Another was of a group marching down an avenue holding a large banner proclaiming: "911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB." Below that was an Internet address: "www.ny911truth.org"

At other blogs I found more rally photos. One showed activists holding a large sign: "THE POLICE ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS." Another in script declared: "From Baghdad to New Orleans Capitalism means Mass Murder. Socialist Revolution is the Only Answer."

At that point (it was about 9 PM Eastern time) I asked myself: How is MSM reporting all of this?

So I read The Associated Press' Internet account of the rally.

And oh, as the AP told it, the rally was all just grand, and no one carried signs and banners such as I'd just seen.

Here's the AP, a news organization every bit as objective as The New York Times and The BBC, reporting to you:

Crowds opposed to the war in Iraq surged past the White House on Saturday, shouting "Peace now" in the largest anti-war protest in the nation's capital since the U.S. invasion.

The rally stretched through the day and into the night, a marathon of music, speechmaking and dissent on the National Mall.
<...>
In the crowd: young activists, nuns whose anti-war activism dates to Vietnam, parents mourning their children in uniform lost in Iraq, and uncountable families motivated for the first time to protest.

And what about the signs and banners, you may be asking? Didn't the AP tell us about them?

Well yes, it did, sort of. But it only mentioned two; and neither one of them have we been talking about. But that doesn't surprise you, does it?

Here's everything the AP told us about signs and banners at the rally:

"Bush Lied, Thousands Died," said one sign. "End the Occupation," said another.

That's it, folks. There was nothing else.

Now, how do you think an MSM news organization such as Raleigh's News and Observer is going to report the rally?

Do you think you'll read anything in The N&O about castrating Vice-president Cheney or that "THE POLICE ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS?"

I don't.

But when The N&O's devoted readers say tomorrow morning after church or coffee or during a cell call, "Well, I didn't see anything in The N&O about the sort of signs you're talking about," the other person is going to be able to say, "I'd like to show you these Internet sites here and here and here."

And therein lies photo blogging's challenge to MSM news organizations like The N&O still trying to hang on to a "we control information; we know what you need to know" world.

Take a look at tomorrow's N&O.

And then let's talk more about all this Monday.

Here.

Excellent Rita coverage sites

There are many places to go for excellent Rita coverage. Michelle Malkin and Glenn Reynolds' blogs are two of them.

Closer to home in North Carolina, Confederate Yankee is one of my first stops. He tells us today:

WRAL-TV in Raleigh, NC has what appears to be a complete list of links to local television (including some excellent live webcasts) and newspapers in Texas and Louisiana.

So far , it is the absolute best resource I've found for covering Hurricane Rita on a local level.

And visit Raleigh's News and Observer. The paper gave extensive coverage to Katrina and I's sure it'll do the same with Rita.

Let's hope things are not as bad as predicted and do what we can to help.

Cindy's "peace activists" should say a prayer

In February 2003 the following letter to the editor appeared in The Wall Street Journal. It made sense then and does now. It's thoughtful and timely as Cindy Sheehan and the bash-America first, most and always "peace movement" crowd assembles today in Washington.

______________________________________________________________


To the editor

In his Feb. 12 op-ed (The Antiwar Anti-Semites) Rabbi Michael Lerner says: “Imagine my surprise when I found out that I am banned from speaking at a peace really (in San Francisco) this Sunday.” The rally’s organizers banned Lerner, a veteran political activist, after he denounced the anti-Semitism of those on the far left who dominate the leadership of the anti-War movement.

While I admire Lerner for speaking out, I can’t imagine why he was surprised the rally organizers decided to silence him. Surely he knows that the far left, like the far right, tolerates neither dissent from its doctrines nor criticism of its leaders. The American far left would no more tolerate criticism of its anti-Semitism than the Communists and Nazis tolerated criticism of theirs.

Lerner says he will continue his antiwar activities. If one of those activities is a rally at which he speaks, I hope the rabbi will invite the participants to join him in asking God’s blessing on the protectors of their freedoms: America’s Constitutional government, its tolerant citizens, and its armed forces.
________________________________________________________________

Amen.

Knucklehead of the Day winners

William at Florida Masochist is a fine blogger who does a lot of good for his community, Palm Beach, and his state.

One way William does good is with his Knucklehead of the Day award. Recipients typically include loud and the lazy bureaucrats looking for reasons to enforce dumb rules and people who carry signs that say things like, "Cindy's real great! Hillary/Cindy in '08!"

Today's Knucklehead winners are a pair of thieves who stole a gas station employee's car. An hour later they came back to the same station, to gas it up!

Go read. And be sure to take a look around while you're at Florida Masochist.

Turning terrorists loose

Blogger John Byrnes calls our attention to a Sept. 22 London Telegraph report that includes this:

“More than a dozen prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay have returned to the ‘battlefield’ to fight Americans. The terrorists, freed in the belief that "they posed a very low threat", have either been killed, captured or wounded in attacks on coalition forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Others are thought to be still organizing attacks with the Taliban or al Qa'eda.”

John reacts to the Telegraph report with very thoughtful commentary on matters relating to enemy combatants. Here's part of what he says:

It is unlikely that this evidence will convince the left that (Guantanamo) is a necessary evil of modern life. But there is hope that it will convince anyone who merely harbored doubts. It is unfortunate, that America, the symbol of democracy worldwide, must maintain such a prison. But we must remember why.

John makes the "why" so clear even Sen. Dick Durbin and Rep. Nancy Polosi should understand it:

We didn't ask to be attacked on September 11, 2001. We didn't ask the Taliban to harbor al-Quaeda. We didn't tell them to wage a war of terror. We didn't force them to fight as non-state guerillas. And we certainly didn't tell the prisoners we released to pick up arms again.

Here's John's closer:

Do our liberals have any good answer to the problem? For years we've allowed murderers back on the street in America. Respect for the constitution has forced us to tolerate that. But the constitution calls on the Government to provide for self defense. It does not require us to allow foreigners to walk free while planning our destruction.

John has first hand experience with terrorists and their evil. As a NY National Guard member, he was a responder at the WTC beginning on 9/11; and he recently completed a tour of duty in Iraq.

John's post is here.

To Ralph Neas: Thanks for reminding us

Ralph Neas, president of the liberal advocacy group, People for the American Way, is not a happy guy right now. No one's worked harder than Neas to prevent the confirmation of President Bush's judicial nominees. And now things seem to be falling apart for Neas.

Just yesterday,the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy, announced he would vote to confirm Judge Roberts. That threw Neas into a fit of anger:

''When John Roberts becomes chief justice and votes to erode or overturn longstanding Supreme Court precedents protecting fundamental civil rights, women's rights, privacy, religious liberty, reproductive rights, and environmental safeguards, Senator Leahy's support for Roberts will make him complicit in those rulings."

Gone now are what for Neas were the happy days when he could insist that eminently qualified nominees like Miquel Estrada and Priscilla Owen not even get a full Senate vote on their nominations. That both had received the American Bar Association's highest rating for judicial nominees, Well Qualified, was beside the point. Neas didn't want them confirmed. That's what seemed to matter

Neas' happy days were only a few years ago. What changed in the meantime?

The Senate went from Democratic to Republican control.

It's elections, not the Ralph Neas inside the beltway, that matter most. We sometimes forget or deny that. Neas' anger fit reminds us they do.

Thanks, Ralph Neas.

Kerry uses Katrina for fund-raising

Scott at Right in Raleigh gives us details concerning Sen. John Kerry's use of Katrina for campaign fund-raising.

You'd think people wouldn't do that, especially a guy who lives in 5 houses, has 3 SUVs registered in his name, travels in a private jet, and sails a 44 foot motorized yacht.

I guess it takes all kinds

Cindy Sheehan and hot dog stands

Confederate Yankee tells us about Cindy Sheehan's latest rally in New York City. As always, he has details and sharp observations.

Detail: Sheehan drew a crowd of 150.

No, I didn't drop some zeros. It was 150.

In The Big Apple you can sometimes find that size crowd at popular hot dog stands.

Read Confederate Yankee for more.

Crying for Dan Rather, CBS and others

Michelle Malkin calls attention to the "crocodile tear-shedding, lip-quivering meltdown" of former CBS News anchor Dan Rather during a speech Monday night in which, according to ABC News/Reuters, he "complained of a climate of fear running through newsrooms stronger than he has ever seen in his more than four-decade career."

A climate of fear in newsrooms? Really?

And what does Rather think ran through the minds of tens of millions Americans, including millions who had trusted him and CBS to tell them the truth, when they learned the identity of the anonymous source of the forged documents Rather and CBS used in the Texas Air National Guard story?

For more than 10 days Rather and CBS assured us their anonymous source was "unimpeachable." And they wouldn't lie. They were news professionals.

Then a year ago tomorrow, Sept. 21, the Washington Post told us the name of their "unimpeachable source" and something about him:

The man CBS News touted as the "unimpeachable source" of explosive documents about President Bush's National Guard service turns out to be a former Guard officer with a history of self-described mental problems who has denounced Bush as a liar with "demonic personality shortcomings."

Over the past three years, retired Lt. Col. Bill Burkett has given dozens of newspaper and television interviews accusing the president and his aides of destroying documents and stealing elections. In e-mail messages to an Internet chat group for Texas Democrats, he has also said that the "Bush team" sent "goons" to intimidate him at his ranch in Baird, Tex.

"They can go to hell," the retired officer, 55, wrote in a March 29 posting. "I'll continue to defend the freedom of this nation -- not the liars who have wrested its helm."

There's much more. Read the whole thing.

Rather's crying for himself, CBS, and those in the news business like them.

Pointing the way to a thinker's "gems"

At Betsy's Page she reminds us of "the gems" to be found in Thomas Sowell's Random thoughts columns. She provides examples from his Sept 20 column. My favorite was this one:

Students can graduate from even the most prestigious colleges and universities wholly unaware that there are not simply different opinions about particular issues but a whole comprehensive framework of ideas and analysis through which those issues can be seen in a way that leads to very different conclusions from the ones their professors have taught or insinuated.

Betsy got me to go to Sowell's column to see all "the gems." Here are two more I liked:

Do the people who are making so much noise about the difficulties of creating a constitution in Iraq have any awareness that it was 13 years after the Declaration of Independence before the Constitution of the United States was created?

When Ronald Reagan said that the government was spending money like a drunken sailor, he apologized to the sailors, who were after all spending their own money.

I hope you read Sowell's column and find some "gems" yourself.

President Clinton's trustworthiness

Remember when a federal judge cited President Clinton for civil contempt and fined him $90,000 for giving "intentionally false" testimony under oath?

Do you recall that the bar association in Clinton’s home state, Arkansas, investigated him further; and then recommended to its state Supreme Court his disbarment?

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed its bar association’s recommendation, and so informed the United States Supreme Court.

Thus it was that on October 1, 2001, without dissent and for the first time in the nation’s history, the Supreme Court acted to disbar a former President.

The court’s disbarment procedure allowed for a 40-day appeal period.

Clinton assured friends and foes that he would appeal and vigorously fight his disbarment.

Of course, Clinton did neither which was just what friends and foes expected.

Now, Clinton is using Katrina and its aftermath to attack President Bush.

Do you think what Clinton’s saying now is any more trustworthy than what he’s said in the past?

I don't.

The Boston Globe's good call and bad call

The Boston Globe editorial board today made a surprising good call and a disappointing bad call.

The good call:

Barring the revelation of an outrageous scandal, Judge John Roberts is about to become the next chief justice of the United States, and based on his testimony last week, he deserves to be confirmed. In the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Roberts called himself a ''modest judge" and appeared smart and even-tempered.

Roberts "deserves to be confirmed." Quite a statement from a very liberal paper owned by The New York Times Company. A hat tip to The Globe on that.

Now the bad call:

As Roberts approaches the high court, there is also a job for Congress. Senator Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, virtually wept about the nation's divisiveness, but he and some of his colleagues have been the source of intemperate rhetoric that could weaken the independence of the judiciary. Once Roberts is confirmed, Coburn and other conservatives need to cool their rhetoric and let the chief justice do his job

So The Globe feels "conservatives need to cool their (intemperate) rhetoric."

And what about liberals? For example:

Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) who said of Judge Priscilla Owen: "This is not a person to put on the bench for a lifetime appointment. This person is wacko! She's wacko!"

Harkin made his remarks shortly after the American Bar Association, by unanimous vote of its committee on federal judicial nominations, had given Owen its highest recommendation:Highly Qualified.

And there's Senator Chuck Schumer (D- NY) who said: "For years, the federal courts served as the shield protecting basic civil rights in this country. This administration wants the courts to become the sword that destroys those rights. And don't think this stops with Judge Pickering. He's just the tip of the iceberg."

Judge Charles Pickering,like Owen, received the ABA's Highly Qualified rating.

And then there's The Globe's own home state Senator, Ted Kennedy (D-Mass). Remember what Kennedy called a group of President Bush's judicial nominees, all of whom the ABA had rated Qualified or Highly Qualified? He called them "Neanderthals."

Clearly, liberals have engaged in a great deal of intemperate rhetoric concerning judges and the judiciary. For The Globe to ignore that while singling out conservatives for intemperate rhetoric is a bad call. It suggests partisan favoritism and will lead liberals to reasonably conclude they can engage in such rhetoric with no fear of criticism by The Globe.

I hope we soon see a Globe editorial reminding liberals they too need to cool their intemperate rhetoric. That would be a good call.

Rather and CBS's falsehoods remembered

A year ago today CBS was still standing by the Dan Rather/Texas Air National Guard story it had broadcast 10 days earlier on 60 Minutes II.

In defending what most people knew by then were forged documents which served as the basis of the story, Rather and CBS had repeatedly claimed their anonymous source for the documents was "unimpeachable."

Rather and CBS knew a lot about their "unimpeachable" anonymous source, Bill Burkett.

Remembering that and what we learned a few days later about Burkett helps us to realize just how honest Rather and CBS were with the public.

This from a Sept. 21 Washington Post story:

The man CBS News touted as the "unimpeachable source" of explosive documents about President Bush's National Guard service turns out to be a former Guard officer with a history of self-described mental problems who has denounced Bush as a liar with "demonic personality shortcomings."

Over the past three years, retired Lt. Col. Bill Burkett has given dozens of newspaper and television interviews accusing the president and his aides of destroying documents and stealing elections. In e-mail messages to an Internet chat group for Texas Democrats, he has also said that the "Bush team" sent "goons" to intimidate him at his ranch in Baird, Tex.

"They can go to hell," the retired officer, 55, wrote in a March 29 posting. "I'll continue to defend the freedom of this nation -- not the liars who have wrested its helm."

There's much more. Read the whole thing.

And sometimes it only takes a sentence

There were raised eyebrows in Washington this week when Judge John Roberts' opening statement at his confirmation hearings lasted less that 7 minutes.

That's understandable in a city where 10 and 15 minute "questions" from Senators aren't unusual.

But the length of Roberts' statement was fine for his purposes.

And than there's Mr. E. Housley of Edinburgh, Scotland. In a recent letter to The London Times, he needed only one sentence to effectively call to our attention the self-contradiction of a prominent British politician:

Sir, Last night I heard Ken Clarke, on BBC News, say that he does not believe in referendums but then, in the same breath, say that politicians must listen to the people.

Yours faithfully,
E. Housley

I think Judge Roberts would like Mr. Housley's letter.