tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post8980062165533131878..comments2024-01-04T07:21:18.243-05:00Comments on John In Carolina: Until Proven Innocent questionsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-64374276906243785112007-09-14T20:57:00.000-04:002007-09-14T20:57:00.000-04:00This thread is supposed to be about KC Johnson whi...This thread is supposed to be about KC Johnson whimping on the N&O's frame-up.<BR/><BR/>Stick to that.<BR/><BR/>Good work, John.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-78087225272537605812007-09-14T16:45:00.000-04:002007-09-14T16:45:00.000-04:00I don't believe Nifong ever used Levicy's name.I don't believe Nifong ever used Levicy's name.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-9674792851460405942007-09-14T16:11:00.000-04:002007-09-14T16:11:00.000-04:00There is no law compelling anyone to correct the p...There is no law compelling anyone to correct the police in public. ANeither the ADA, DPD (including the sainted Sheldon) or the Physicians involved felt the responsibility to correct Nifong, how does a lowly staff nurse get in the act? People can not freely give their opinions on the stand. As we have no information from her interview, we do not know what she would have said. Pretty much what she said at the bar hearing - the details of the exam.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-15889748166809475582007-09-14T15:56:00.000-04:002007-09-14T15:56:00.000-04:00The report was not what Nifong would have used in ...The report was not what Nifong would have used in a trial but rather Levicy's statements to police that she believed a rape had occurred. Granted she would have been eviscerated on cross-examination but her testimony might have persuaded a jury, since she would have been someone who saw CGM shortly after the attack and believed she had been raped. The fact that her name was being used by Nifong and she never contradicted him publicly says o me that she shares blame in the hoax. Granted Nifong was the main perpetrator but Levicy was an accomplice. On that KC is exactly right.<BR/><BR/>Brant JonesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-80540244462609125402007-09-14T11:38:00.000-04:002007-09-14T11:38:00.000-04:00NDLax84 - Good to hear from you. Enjoyed your blog...NDLax84 - Good to hear from you. Enjoyed your blog and commentary. <BR/>The only thing Levicy could have testified to was the WHo, What, Where and When of the exam. Which is what she did when questioned by Lawyer Jean. Nifong never had any evidence and certainly not from the report.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-67148632889368258722007-09-14T11:33:00.000-04:002007-09-14T11:33:00.000-04:00The case was not about rape. Anyone who does not u...The case was not about rape. Anyone who does not understand that, does not understand the case. It was only about votes and election for Nifong. He needed no help for his 70 plus interviews. His statement of "My reading of the nurse's report..." was a lie. He never read the report. The report never indicated Crystal had been raped. He went after a low level nurse, but not the Doctors who were in charge of Crystal's care. I like KC but this persecuation is starting to bite him in the nose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-61239013872271854062007-09-14T08:25:00.000-04:002007-09-14T08:25:00.000-04:00RE:12:26 The only evidence Nifong had was Levicy's...RE:12:26<BR/><BR/> The only evidence Nifong had was Levicy's testimony. To my knowledge she has never contradicted her position that CGM was raped. Had there been a trial, she would have been a witness for the prosecution. We now know with certainty that nothing happened that night to CGM. Therefore, rather than whining that Tara is being unjustly picked on, if you think her position is defensible, then give a reasoned explanation of how it is defensible. Otherwise we can conclude that KC is correct in pointing the finger at Levicy. As for the N&O, they certainly deserve condemnation but they were not witnesses as was Levicy.<BR/><BR/>Brant JonesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-66583689942536299932007-09-14T08:14:00.000-04:002007-09-14T08:14:00.000-04:00KC's slip is showing. He jousts indignantly with t...KC's slip is showing. He jousts indignantly with trolls teasing about surname misspellings, dodges pointed inquiry from me and, apparently, now has banned comment upon one <I>particular</I> DIW post? <BR/><BR/>Meow.August Westhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09919963003128838777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-87227080502032795652007-09-14T07:22:00.000-04:002007-09-14T07:22:00.000-04:00A lot of people have caught on to KC's game. The N...A lot of people have caught on to KC's game. The N&O made its reporters available to him for his book and he went soft on the N&O.<BR/><BR/>I admire you for standing up to him and seeking the truth. All bloggers like to say they do that, but not many of them do.<BR/><BR/>Any news on why the N&O withheld all the exculpatory news it had about the players for more than a year? KC doesn't even mention that in the book.<BR/><BR/>And thanks for pointing out the lies Joe Neff told at the press club. Taylor was on the panel with him and didn't say a word.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-74085193369304126242007-09-14T00:26:00.000-04:002007-09-14T00:26:00.000-04:00I had no idea KC had developed a relationship with...I had no idea KC had developed a relationship with the NO. No wonder he has been so easy with Ruthie and the NO stories. I am disappointed. he has constanly pointed a finger at the low level staff nurse with no evidence except his word, but has given Ruthie and the NO a pass for inflaming the Durham Community with their writings.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-25481361064431054422007-09-13T23:48:00.000-04:002007-09-13T23:48:00.000-04:00Sill still needs to explain her newspaper's role i...Sill still needs to explain her newspaper's role in the lacrosse hoax/frame in March of 2006.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com