tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post6069018041631457008..comments2024-01-04T07:21:18.243-05:00Comments on John In Carolina: Stark “refreshing?” No, he’s dangerousUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-68577055060918816672007-10-24T12:16:00.000-04:002007-10-24T12:16:00.000-04:00You coulda knocked me over with a feather!! Stark ...You coulda knocked me over with a feather!! Stark actually apologized, and it wasn't the "...if anyone was offended..." type of apology one usually gets from a Leftist scold. I believe the only reason he did so, however, is because Steny Hoyer and other Dems in the leadership thought it would make it easier to overturn the president's veto of the "childrens' health" issue. I guess Dana the Troll was wrong, after all. Heh heh heh.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-50361986896441138932007-10-24T00:14:00.000-04:002007-10-24T00:14:00.000-04:00I regret to say I live in Stark's district. He is ...I regret to say I live in Stark's district. He is a complete embarrassment, but due to the utter mastery far-left Democrats have in the Bay Area, he is likely to be elected as long as he cares to run. Sadly, this is the current face of the mainstream Democratic Party, as John very correctly points out. And there is little chance of this changing in the near future.がんこもんhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06311940933349299959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-85279851820621693502007-10-23T07:33:00.000-04:002007-10-23T07:33:00.000-04:00Dana's like all the Leftist trolls. All talk and n...Dana's like all the Leftist trolls. All talk and no proof. Dana's had 72 hours to present evidence to back up his/her wild accusations. Thus far: silence. Dana? Are you out there? Cat got your tongue?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-21282998903926124192007-10-22T12:24:00.000-04:002007-10-22T12:24:00.000-04:00Dana, maybe you don't understand the rules of civi...Dana, maybe you don't understand the rules of civil discourse. When you make an assertion, it should be backed up with a citation or reference as proof that the assertion is not baseless. Baseless: as in assertions recently made by Dana?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-48021097122477843442007-10-22T08:07:00.000-04:002007-10-22T08:07:00.000-04:00Dana, we're still waiting for you to back up your ...Dana, we're still waiting for you to back up your claim.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-57640258593169909522007-10-21T16:35:00.000-04:002007-10-21T16:35:00.000-04:00Dana suggests that conservatives routinely say thi...Dana suggests that conservatives routinely say things on the House floor (without stating what those "things" are) which do not elicit hissy fits. I challenge Dana to provide citations for this assertion, because I follow political issues closely and I can find nothing similar to what Stark routinely does. Take all the time you need, Dana, but give us some substantive answers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-74610231611896792702007-10-21T14:13:00.000-04:002007-10-21T14:13:00.000-04:00Dear Dana,I do read my own blog.I noticed you didn...Dear Dana,<BR/><BR/>I do read my own blog.<BR/><BR/>I noticed you didn't cite any examples of "what conservatives say on the House floor." <BR/><BR/>You call me a "bully."<BR/><BR/>Fine.<BR/><BR/>Now what do you think Stark is?<BR/><BR/>Can we agree he's a mainstream Democrat?<BR/><BR/>JohnJWMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08275423713054782480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-81978793240723971932007-10-21T14:00:00.000-04:002007-10-21T14:00:00.000-04:00Do you read your own blog? Do you ever see what co...Do you read your own blog? Do you ever see what conservatives say on the House floor, routinely, without having a hissy fit thrown at them?<BR/><BR/>Typical bully. Loves to dish it out. Can't take it.Danahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08074696834355368984noreply@blogger.com