tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post4076765752070530005..comments2024-01-04T07:21:18.243-05:00Comments on John In Carolina: Why’s the N&O Attacking Newsweek?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-68518366537896527852007-09-24T12:32:00.000-04:002007-09-24T12:32:00.000-04:00The revisionist N&O is intent on "posering" as the...The revisionist N&O is intent on "posering" as the newspaper of record in uncovering the roots of the hoax, when in fact they are the MOST culpable in propagating this thing in the first place.<BR/><BR/>Does this have anything to do with creating a defense in case of a libel lawsuit? Who knows, but I guess they are adherents of the old philosophy ; that the best defense is a good offense!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-39429537145049627092007-09-23T21:29:00.000-04:002007-09-23T21:29:00.000-04:00Thanks John!"Instead of disputing who was first at...Thanks John!<BR/><BR/><I>"Instead of disputing who was first at something they were very late in doing, major publications should examine and report why <B>a few journalists, some bloggers, and many sensible citizens began picking Nifong’s case apart</B> within days of the N&O presenting it on March 25, 2006 in a front-page story headlined without any qualifying quotes..."</I><BR/><BR/>Dead on!<BR/><BR/>It seems obvious that the N&O, along with most of the other media, is set on answering to no one, and few actually question them anyway. We've all seen they can't keep their answers straight between them, so I conclude they lack experience in that area.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-13296539830543993342007-09-23T17:37:00.000-04:002007-09-23T17:37:00.000-04:00I agree, N&O has a lot of explanation to do.I agree, N&O has a lot of explanation to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-58809374863911336502007-09-23T16:15:00.000-04:002007-09-23T16:15:00.000-04:00The N/O cannot even explain their use of anonymous...The N/O cannot even explain their use of anonymous sources, why do you think they can explain this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-44129207685418831662007-09-23T14:18:00.000-04:002007-09-23T14:18:00.000-04:00sighthe N&O is delusionalwho is surprised?sigh<BR/><BR/>the N&O is delusional<BR/><BR/>who is surprised?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com