tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post1152330610707197117..comments2024-01-04T07:21:18.243-05:00Comments on John In Carolina: White House Still Silent On WTC Flyby FighterUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-33144724024778477032009-05-10T08:03:00.000-04:002009-05-10T08:03:00.000-04:00We all klnow who was on the plane. One opf his rel...We all klnow who was on the plane. One opf his relatives. Just seee which one was in the country at the time(b)limeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16721943826336964927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13073631.post-59096193375304572792009-05-09T17:03:00.000-04:002009-05-09T17:03:00.000-04:00John, there is little doubt in my mind that if the...John, there is little doubt in my mind that if the people on board the AF1 backup plane were ONLY military or Secret Service or WH folks, we'd have all the names and their sworn statements to attest to the "no passengers" status of the flight.<br /><br />But we don't have that, and it appears more and more with each passing day that there was someone on board that plane that the White House does not want to make known. Not only is the use of that plane for "joyrides" a violation of all sorts of rules, the continued cover-up is only going to make the inevitable "leakage" more damaging.<br /><br />Frankly, I can't imagine that some of the AF1 crew would be willing to put their careers on the line by going along with the White House on this one. When it does come out who the passenger(s) was (were), BHO will be throwing some rather experienced pilots and crewmen/women under the bus. If I were one of the crew, I'd make damn certain that the information got out somehow, just so I could avoid having to continue the outright lie that it was just a training mission intended to get publicity photos.<br /><br />And the proof of the fallacy of the PR-photo mission is the absolute trashy nature of the photo that has been released. It appears to be a snapshot from a point-and-shoot camera borne by the pilot of the chase plane, not the work of a professional photographer. <br /><br />Don't you think if this was <B>really</B> intended to get PR photos that the resultant photos might actually look more professional than the one we've seen? That also explains why we've only seen one - that's all that there is, because the chase-plane pilot didn't have a chance for a second shot, based on the type of camera he/she was probably using.drewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04750606810537926186noreply@blogger.com